![popular sans serif typeface nyt crossword popular sans serif typeface nyt crossword](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8A-VOrUNzrk/XZkxy0uFuXI/AAAAAAAAm30/ZajoCPX7708Hgnlbohjb5R4jjr-ZGtzywCNcBGAsYHQ/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Oct6.jpeg)
Since Jeff Chen is one of the titans in this sport, I would have liked to at least stay awake, let alone be impressed.
![popular sans serif typeface nyt crossword popular sans serif typeface nyt crossword](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0d/c4/8c/0dc48c75134fa72a11554ef77efda3cf.png)
I thought it was a little testy for a Tuesdee, too. What's next? Words that make sentences? Words that get written down? Words that spell words? Words with letters that have STRAIGHTEDGES. Maybe those of you who have inside knowlEDGE of crossword construction can illuminate for me what is so special about this theme.īecause I can barely keep my eyes open just thinking about it. Big come-down after yesterday's nifty number. ERR ERSE ERNST ELSE OER ONO EBB SELA ETTU ATIT TUTEE this could've been cleaner. Brendan FRASER, that movie doesn't come to mind luckily, there aren't that many actors named Brendan, so FRASER came quickly enough. I'm not sure I ever saw "Crash," and when I think of the expansive oeuvre of Mr. The point is, it's hard to imagine someone "rarefying" anything, least of all air. " Actually, I would never use the phrase. breathing your rarefied air like some kind of duchess. "We need to RAREFY this air, stat!" I only ever (and I mean Only Ever) hear the word used adjectivally, in the purely metaphorical phrase "rarefied air." I think of that air as being the effect of high elevation, like "la-di-dah, look at you up there. I wrote in RARIFY and BORE instead of RAREFY and BORN, so that was bad work on my part. I had PLEAT before DRAPE (7A: Arrange in folds). ET TU, TUTEE is making me laugh, in a "so bad it's good" way, though. huh." " REBEL REBEL" is a great song and I'm never going to object to seeing Bowie in the grid, but the fact that you have a to repeat a word to get this theme to be In Any Way interesting tells you something. I wonder how many people started solving and just wrote in the letters to the side of the damned "vertical lines" only to realize later on, "oh, I was supposed to. to them, and honestly, even if I was solving this on paper, I'd resent the NYTXW putting in little "vertical lines" for me to use like a little trellis on which to build the rest of the letters that go in those squares. Look, the theme does Not work electronically, which is how So Many people solve now, so it's a giant F.U. Not sure how you get away with a theme like this. Ī better rationale for why ON should be next to OFF, and some cleanup in the grid, and this would have gotten POW! attention.This is one of those ideas you have when you're just brainstorming and you jot it down in your notebook and you realized it can't possibly produce a joyful result so you scrap it. I think you could eliminate KUNST (and still have a good grid) by swapping SON OF FRANKENSTEIN and IMMIGRATION OFFICE. If you can ignore the glaring KUNST, it's a good grid. But thankfully, there was only some OBJ, AERO, PERI elsewhere.
![popular sans serif typeface nyt crossword popular sans serif typeface nyt crossword](https://www.typewolf.com/assets/img/og/sans-serif-fonts.png)
It's also so hard to accept KUNST as a valid entry - talk about deep into foreign languages. I like what Julie did with OFF TONE - neat solution for a tricky region. It's even harder when rebus squares have to work with each other. Average for a rebus is five or six, so ten is a tough ask. It's so hard to work with a big number of rebus squares. Most solvers probably won't care, or even notice, but I thought it was an elegant touch of symmetry. It was pleasing that two of them broke in the *ON / OFF* pattern, while the other two used *ON / OF / F*. A ton of color from these themers nice variety. The four great phrases, mind you! CARBON OFFSETS gets a lot of buzz these days, SON OF FRANKENSTEIN feels classic, IMMIGRATION OFFICE solid, and PERSON OF FAITH to round it out. Scratching it out.)Īlthough the revealer wasn't as spot-on as I would have liked, I did enjoy uncovering those dual rebuses in the four phrases. Writing that down in my notebook of ideas…) (That implementation would have been perfect for ON OFF SWITCH. Ooh, here's a clever idea: ON AND OFF so aptly describes a rebus ON in the across direction … which changes into an OFF rebus in the down direction! ON AND OFF could have just as easily explained: "phrases that contain one instance of ON and then one of OFF, not necessarily adjacent." I wish there had been a sharper a-ha moment, with the revealer slyly giving a rationale for why ON and OFF should be right next to each other. ON AND OFF hinting at two rebus squares next to each other.